Important Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By accessing this website (www.vakeellaw.com) the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the firm or its members.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for information purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. The firm is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.

Notices – Vakeel Law

At Vakeel Law, one of the best law firm in Kolkata, with our team of skilled and experienced professionals, you stay updated with the highlights of recent legal cases.

Female Employees In Private & Unorganized Sector Also Untitled for a 180 Days Maternity Leave – Rajasthan HC

In September 2024, the Rajasthan High Court ruled that all female employees in the state are entitled to 180 days of maternity leave, regardless of their nature of employment.

The court ruled that the employer must grant 180 days of maternity leave, or provide 90 days’ salary as compensation if the leave cannot be granted. The court directed the state and central governments to issue orders to all sectors to amend their provisions to grant 180 days of maternity leave.

The court said that maternity benefits are a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court said that maternity leave is important for the health and well-being of both the mother and her child. The court said that maternity leave protects the interests of mothers and their livelihoods, and allows them to care for themselves and their children.

The court said that maternity leave is a significant step towards gender equality in the workplace. The court’s decision was made in the case of Minakshi Chaudhary v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr.

Choice of Marriage and Protection of Individual Rights: A Landmark Judgment

In a recent and significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court reaffirmed the fundamental right of individuals to choose their life partner. This decision, grounded in the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, underscores the judiciary’s commitment to protecting personal freedoms and safeguarding individuals from societal pressures and threats.

The case, Naziya Ansari and Another vs. State of UP and Others (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 9396 of 2024), revolves around the rights of two adults who chose to marry according to their free will. The petitioners, who faced harassment and threats from family members, sought legal protection from the state. The court’s verdict not only quashed the baseless FIR lodged against the couple but also issued clear directives for their safety.

Implementation of Minimum Stipend for Junior Advocates – Delhi HC

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken note of the public interest petition W.P.(C) 10159/2024, filed by Simran Kumari, seeking directions to issue guidelines or a circular mandating the payment of a minimum stipend to Junior Advocates employed by Advocates, Senior Advocates, and Law Firms.

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, through its order dated July 25, 2024, has directed the Bar Council of India to act on the petitioner’s representation dated January 27, 2024, regarding the payment of a minimum stipend. The matter was considered in the last BCI meeting, but a decision was deferred, with another meeting scheduled within four weeks.

Scroll to Top